Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is one of the method for making osteoporosis diagnosis. World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the measurement of BMD conducted at antero-posterior lumbar vertebrae, unilateral hip (femur), and radius. However, there was a concern about osteoporosis under diagnosis if the measurement is only conducted at unilateral hip. Some studies found significant differences of BMD between both femur and evidence of the importance to examine both femur in making the diagnosis of osteoporosis. This study aims to determine anydifference between right and left femur BMD measurement and to investigate the bone status result with measurement of BMD of bilateral femur in Hasan Sadikin General Hospital.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from June to November 2015. Patients who received dual-femur BMD testing using General Electrics (GE) Lunar Prodigy dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the DXA Facility in Hasan Sadikin General Hospital,
Bandung between January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2014 were included. Statistical analysis performed to assess the difference and the correlation between the
BMD of two femurs (g/cm2). T-scores of the subject were implemented into bone status according to WHO Diagnostic Criteria for Osteoporosis.

Results: From sixty-one patients included in this study, there were difference bone status resulted from BMD of the femoral neck, Ward’s triangle, trochanter, and
total hip area between right and left femur, although no statistically significance were found. There was a positive correlation between BMD of right and left femur
at all areas of femur. There were 16 subjects (26.1%) showed combination level of bone status (normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis in one femur).

Conclusion: BMD results in each area of the right and left femurs are different.Therefore, performing bilateral hip BMD examination as a routine measurement for makingdiagnosis of osteoporosis is important.

Keywords: Bone Mineral Density, Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry, Femur, Osteoporosis

Article Details

How to Cite
Widjanarko, A. L. (2018). Do we need to perform bilateral hip bone mineral density examination?. Indonesian Journal of Rheumatology, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.37275/ijr.v8i2.53

References

  1. International Osteoporosis Foundation. Asia Pacific Audit Indonesia. Hong Kong: International Osteoporosis Foundation; 2013.
  2. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2010.
  3. Schousboe JT, Shepherd JA, Bilezikian JP, Baim S. Executive summary of the 2013 ISCD Position Development Conference on bone densitometry. JCD. 2013;16(4):455-467.
  4. Hwang JH, Park SY, Lee SH, Han SB, Ro KH. Differences in bone mineral density between the right and left hips in postmenopausal women. J Korean Med Sci. 2012; 27:689-690.
  5. El Maghraoui A, Roux C. DXA scanning in clinical practice. QJM. 2008;101(8):605-17.
  6. Mounach A, Abayi DA, Ghazi M, Ghozlani I, Nouijai A, Achemlal L, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of discordance between left- and right-hip bone mineral density using DXA. ISRN Rheumatology. 2012;108(6):289-295.
  7. Myint PK, Poole KES, Warburton EA. Hip fractures after stroke and their prevention. QJM. 2007;100(9):539-545.
  8. Hamdy R, Kiebzak GM, Seier E, Watts NB. The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density. OSTEOPOROSIS INT. 2006;17(12):1772-1780.
  9. Cole RE. Larson J. The effect of measurement of the contralateral hip if the spine is not included in the bone mineral density analysis. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2006;9(2):210-216.
  10. Seeman E, Delmas PD. Bone quality—the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N ENGL J MED. 2006;354(21):2250-61.
  11. Cole RE. Improving clinical decisions for women at risk of osteoporosis: dual-femur bone mineral density testing. J AM OSTEOPATH ASSOC. 2008;108(6):289-95